🔗 Share this article

Just 48 hours prior to the NYC mayoral election, Michael Lange issued a significant forecast – going beyond the winner overall, but block by block. Lange, an expert in elections who grew up in New York City, has spent over a decade in progressive politics and has become something of a local celebrity recently for his thorough analyses into city data and polling.

He released his extremely precise prediction map – which correctly forecast that Zohran Mamdani would win while failed to predict Andrew Cuomo’s solid showing – on his Substack, the Narrative War. Lange has a flair for clever terms. He pointed out, for instance, the split between the “commie corridor”, stretching from one neighborhood to Bushwick to Astoria, where he predicted (accurately) that the left-wing candidate would triumph by large leads, and the conservative-leaning zone on affluent parts of Manhattan. There, certain media outlets and financial newspapers outrank the mainstream paper” in audience and the majority of electors favored Cuomo, who ran as a conservative-courting independent.

Election Night Patterns and Unexpected Results

What was your election night?

I had to do that because they were adding approximately 200K ballots into the tally every few minutes! I felt a little nervous initially: Mamdani was ahead the initial ballots by a dozen percentage points, but there were large groups of ballots added after that and the advantage went from 12% to 8%. It was concerning.

Understand, it was possible where yesterday went kind of poorly for Mamdani, where Cuomo would have essentially increasing his support from the earlier contest. However Mamdani gained half a million supporters to his initial base, and that’s a huge reason why he won. He campaigned and greatly broadened his base from the primary.

Coalition Building

How did Mamdani get those extra votes from?

He assembled the coalition that progressives always wanted to build: it’s multiracial, youthful, tenants and individuals facing cost pressures. He improved significantly with minority communities, working- and middle-class voters, relative to the primary. Plus he further maximized his base of left-leaning activists, youthful radicals, and immigrant groups. He couldn’t have won without making those significant inroads.

He created the alliance that the left long aimed for: diverse, young, renters and people squeezed by affordability

There were also some Trump/Mamdani voters – is this significant?

It’s definitely a genuine phenomenon, limited to Hispanic laborers, Asian communities and Muslims. Electors in ethnic enclaves that went for the former president previously backed Zohran now. However I wouldn’t say he was winning over Caucasian laborers and Trump loyalists.

Voter Participation and Impact

A major development of the night was the record participation. Who benefited?

Each candidate. Turnout was significantly higher than I had expected. I thought it could exceed two million, but it reached 2.3M – which is a huge number of participants. There was a substantial anti-Mamdani block, energized, but his supporters was equally driven, and that sufficed to secure victory.

You forecasted he’d get over half the ballots. Is he on course for that?

Right now you would say he’s likely to get over 50%. He has 50.4% but remain probably 200,000 votes uncounted as of Wednesday morning. Thus I don’t think it’s definitive, but I think probable, and I hope he does because then none can claim the Republican was a disruptor.

Republican Collapse

The GOP candidate, the conservative contender, was another surprise. His support completely collapsed.

He didn’t win a single precinct in any area. Including one neighborhood in Staten Island, similar to an highly conservative neighborhood. That truly surprised me. Cuomo kept Caucasian districts, affluent zones and very religiously Jewish areas, and then added many conservatives on the island with a strong turnout. I think occurred significant strategic balloting by GOP voters. They were doing it before Trump tweeted his support for the candidate, but it assisted. It could have even turned the tide if Mamdani’s coalition hadn’t grown.

Progressive Strongholds

Regarding your much mentioned “commie corridor” – was support for the candidate dominant in those areas of Brooklyn and Queens?

I think existed some weakening of the commie corridor in certain places like Astoria or Greenpoint that have more older white ethnic folks. There, instance, the Greek landlords and residents all went for the independent. Thus there was some opposition. But overall, mostly the leftist base is another huge reason why Zohran won – he was polling between 77% and 83% in Fort Greene, Clinton Hill and Bushwick.

Community Support

Prior to the vote we reported on if the candidate was gaining ground with Jewish New Yorkers. Any indication that he did?

There are neighborhoods with a lot of secular and more progressive-leaning Jews – such as Park Slope and Morningside Heights – where he did well. But in the affluent districts like the Upper East Side, his Middle East stance was influential in those places. Similarly in the moderate communities like Queens neighborhoods, or Spuyten Duyvil and Riverdale – they favored Cuomo. And also, there are newcomers from Eastern Europe in southern Brooklyn, who were strongly Cuomo. So it’s unclear if there were major surprises here, but he did hold left-leaning areas and even parts of the Upper West Side by big margins.

Political Impact

Has Mamdani rewritten what the city means politically? Will commie corridor become a launch pad for leftwing candidates?

Yes, it’s no coincidence that some of the biggest figures from progressives come from a handful of neighborhoods in the boroughs. I’m sure that we’ll see more of that – people will come from these neighborhoods to be elevated nationally.

However I think that every city in the US could develop their own commie corridor. Urban places are the epicenters of leftwing power in the nation – because they’re young, people rent and they represent locales where people are crushed by the inequalities we face.